Full-Time, Year-Round Worker

When debating issues of gender-equality, one commonly cited problem is the wage-gap.  When you take the average income of women, and divide that over the average income of men, you will see that women earn roughly 77% of what men earn…a wage gap of about 23%.  Feminists tend to claim this is a result of sex-discrimination…which is typically rebutted by pointing to life-choices.  Men tend to choose higher-paying fields, longer hours, etc.  In response to this (the “human capital” argument), some researchers have started controlling for certain life-choices (e.g. degree, field, etc.).  Many of the discrimination-advocates purport to account for the disparity in hours worked by controlling for what is called “full-time, year-round workers”.  The researchers themselves don’t explicitly state they are controlling for hours…because that would be a lie, but that doesn’t stop them from insinuating as much.  Certain third-parties, however, do explicitly make such false claims.
Continue reading


Why I’m an Antifeminist

If you haven’t already, please read my previous entries: Feminism and Antifeminism (in that order), as they provide the necessary context for this post.

This whole “antifeminism” thing can be confusing, as someone who opposes gender-feminism, but not equity-feminism would, technically, be an “antifeminist” even if they don’t identify as such. It leaves a lot of wiggle room and doesn’t tell you a whole lot about what the person actually believes. So to make my position clear: I believe that women, as a class, are no longer disadvantaged relative to men, as a class…in most western post-industrial nations. As such, I oppose “first-world feminism”, but not “third-world feminism”. In fact, I’m very pro-feminist when it comes to countries like Iran, Saudi Arabia, etc.

Continue reading


The general definition of antifeminism is summed up broadly by Wikipedia1:

Antifeminism is opposition to feminism in some or all of its forms.

Michael Kimmel, feminist, defines it in a more insulting way. For him, antifeminism is defined thusly2:

the opposition to women’s equality.

Clearly there’s a disconnect here.  As I’ve already shown in my entry for “feminism”, feminism involves a bit more than simply “women’s equality”, and so opposing feminism (which is what the “anti” prefix indicates), wouldn’t necessarily mean you oppose equality.

Continue reading


Feminism is both an ideology, and a political movement centered on this ideology.  For our purposes, I will be focusing on the ideology, as opposed to the movement, because adherence to ideology is what should, in my view, distinguish “feminist” from non-feminist. According to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy1:

a Liberal approach […] might define feminism (rather simplistically here) in terms of two claims:

  1. (Normative) Men and women are entitled to equal rights and respect.
  2. (Descriptive) Women are currently disadvantaged with respect to rights and respect, compared with men […in such and such respects and due to such and such conditions…].

  Continue reading